Projected impact: +$4,200/month at current traffic.Useful for showing a stakeholder “why we should ship this”. Easy to over-read if you do not know what it is assuming.
What it is doing
Simple math:- Take the observed lift on the primary goal (say +3.2 % conversion rate).
- Take current traffic on the tested pages (visitors per month, from the ledger).
- Multiply. For a revenue goal, use the observed revenue per converter; for a click goal, use the value you configured on the goal.
What it assumes
- The lift holds. The observed lift is what the test measured. It can shrink in production (regression to the mean), especially on early or under-powered tests.
- Traffic holds. Current-month traffic is a poor proxy for Black Friday.
- The value holds. For a revenue goal, the goal’s average value is used. Big shifts in AOV break the projection.
Where it can mislead
- Very small samples. A hundred-visitor test showing +3.2 % lift probably does not have a real 3.2 % effect. The projection uses the point estimate, not the lower bound of the CI. Read the CI alongside.
- Guardrail-breaking winners. The projection assumes only the primary goal moves. If the variant tanks a guardrail, the honest impact is smaller than the projection shows.
- Cannibalized traffic. If the test’s page competes with another page for the same conversion, a win in one place can be a loss somewhere else the projection does not see.
How to use it
- As a magnitude. Is this a 20,000/month test? The projection is honest to an order of magnitude.
- As a stakeholder-friendly summary. “This is worth shipping” reads better with a currency figure.
- Not as a business plan. For a real forecast, take the lower CI bound, discount for regression, and add your own market assumptions.